不同治疗时机下超脉冲CO2点阵激光联合机械减张及硅凝胶治疗 面颈部手术切口瘢痕的效果比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

鲁小萌(1980.9-),女,江苏扬州人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事整形美容手术、光电美肤联合治疗、注射抗衰、 瘢痕整复等方面工作

通讯作者:

陈小光(1965.4-),男,广东广州人,本科,副主任医师,主要从事整形美容外科方面工作

中图分类号:

R619+.6

基金项目:


Comparison of Effects of Ultrapulsed CO2 Fractional Laser Combined with Mechanical Tension-reduction and Silicone Gel for Facial and Cervical Surgical Incision Scars at Different Treatment Timing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究不同治疗时机下超脉冲CO2点阵激光联合机械减张及硅凝胶治疗面颈部手术切口瘢痕 的效果,明确最佳干预时机。方法 回顾性分析2024年2月-2026年1月暨南大学附属广东省第二人民医院 收治的100例面颈部手术患者临床资料,按术后针对切口瘢痕治疗的时间分为W1组和M1组,各50例。 两组均接受超脉冲CO2点阵激光联合机械减张及硅凝胶多模态干预,W1组拆线后1周启动干预,M1 组拆线后1个月启动干预,比较两组末次治疗后1个月瘢痕宽度与厚度、V S S评分、POS A S评分、 满意度及不良反应发生率。结果 W1组瘢痕宽度、厚度均低于M1组(P <0.05);W1组VSS评分低于 M1组(P <0.05);W1组POSAS评分改善≥1级占比为84.00%,高于M1组的42.00%(P <0.05);W1组 满意度高于M1组(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 拆线后1周 启动超脉冲CO2点阵激光联合机械减张及硅凝胶多模态干预,在瘢痕形成及形态改善方面均优于拆线后 1个月启动治疗,同时有助于提高美观度及患者满意度,且安全性良好,不会增加不良反应风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the efficacy of ultrapulsed CO2 fractional laser combined with mechanical tension-reduction and silicone gel in the treatment of facial and cervical surgical incision scars under different treatment timing, and to identify the optimal intervention time. Methods The clinical data of 100 patients undergoing facial and cervical surgery admitted to Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University from February 2024 to January 2026 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the time of scar treatment after operation, they were divided into W1 group and M1 group, with 50 patients in each group. Both groups received multimodal intervention of ultrapulsed CO2 fractional laser combined with mechanical tensionreduction and silicone gel. The W1 group received intervention at 1 week after suture removal, while the M1 group received it at 1 month after suture removal. The scar width and thickness, VSS score, POSAS score, satisfaction and adverse reaction rate were compared between the two groups at 1 month after the last treatment. Results The scar width and thickness in W1 group were lower than those in M1 group (P <0.05). The VSS score of W1 group was lower than that of M1 group (P <0.05). The proportion of patients with POSAS score improvement ≥grade 1 in W1 group was 84.00%, which was higher than 42.00% in M1 group (P <0.05).The satisfaction in W1 group was higher than that in M1 group (P <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P >0.05). Conclusion Initiating multimodal intervention with ultrapulsed CO2 fractional laser combined with mechanical tension-reduction and silicone gel at 1 week after suture removal achieves better improvement in scar formation and morphology than intervention started at 1 month after suture removal. It can improve aesthetic appearance and patient satisfaction, and has good safety, without increasing the risk of adverse reactions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

鲁小萌,蔡雪欣,陈小光.不同治疗时机下超脉冲CO2点阵激光联合机械减张及硅凝胶治疗 面颈部手术切口瘢痕的效果比较[J].医学美学美容,2026,35(14):119-123.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-09-10
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码