基于浓缩生长因子的引导骨再生术对种植体周软硬组织的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

阿迪力·麦木提敏(1992.5-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事口腔种植修复方面研究

通讯作者:

肖朋(1983.3-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,硕士,硕士研究生导师,主任医师,主要从事颞下颌关节紊乱病的保守治疗及口腔种植方面研究

中图分类号:

R783

基金项目:

新疆医科大学第七附属医院院内科研基金项目(编号:YZR2023-05)


Effect of Concentrated Growth Factor-based Guided Bone Regeneration on Peri-implant Soft and Hard Tissues
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨基于浓缩生长因子(CGF)的引导骨再生术(GBR)对种植体周软硬组织的影响。方法 选取2023年10月-2024年10月就诊于新疆医科大学第七附属医院的60例后牙种植区骨量不足和牙龈缺损患者,以随机数字表法分为对照组、观察组,各30例。两组均行种植体植入术,对照组采用GBR,观察组采用CGF联合GBR,比较两组疼痛程度、种植体留有率、黏膜愈合情况、骨量厚度、骨组织修复效果、角化龈宽度。结果 观察组术后24 h VAS评分低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后6个月种植体留存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组黏膜愈合优良率(100.00%)高于对照组(90.00%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后6、12个月种植体水平向、垂直向骨量均高于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后6、9、12个月骨组织修复优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后6、12个月角化龈宽度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 将CGF联合GBR应用于后牙区骨量不足和牙龈缺损的种植修复,可有效提升成骨能力与软组织再生效果,优化种植体周软硬组织条件。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF)-based guided bone regeneration (GBR) on peri-implant soft and hard tissues. Methods A total of 60 patients with insufffcient bone mass and gingival defect in posterior implant areas treated at the Seventh Afffliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from October 2023 to October 2024 were selected, and they were divided into the control group and the observation group by the random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. Both groups received implant placement. The control group received GBR, and the observation group received CGF combined with GBR. The pain intensity, implant survival rate, mucosal healing, bone thickness, bone tissue repair effect and keratinized gingival width were compared between the two groups. Results The VAS score in the observation group at 24 h after operation was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically signiffcant (P>0.05). There was no signiffcant difference in implant survival rate between the two groups at 6 months after operation (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of mucosal healing in the observation group (100.00%) was higher than that in the control group (90.00%), but the difference was not statistically signiffcant (P>0.05). The horizontal and vertical bone mass around implants in the observation group at 6 and 12 months after operation were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no signiffcant difference in the excellent and good rates of bone tissue repair between two groups at 6, 9 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). The keratinized gingival width in the observation group at 6 and 12 months after operation was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of CGF combined with GBR in implant restoration for insufffcient bone mass and gingival defect in posterior areas can effectively improve osteogenic capacity and soft tissue regeneration, and optimize the conditions of peri-implant soft and hard tissues.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

阿迪力·麦木提敏,汪萍慧,肖 朋.基于浓缩生长因子的引导骨再生术对种植体周软硬组织的影响[J].医学美学美容,2026,35(8):70-74.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码