不同种植修复方案对后牙缺失患者咀嚼舒适度与美观满意度的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

雷邓(1986.1-),男,湖南长沙人,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事口腔疾病诊治工作

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R783

基金项目:


Effect of Different Implant Restoration Protocols on Masticatory Comfort and Aesthetic Satisfaction in Patients with Posterior Tooth Loss
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨不同种植修复方案对后牙缺失患者咀嚼舒适度与美观满意度的影响。方法 选取2023年1月-2025年1月长沙市第四医院口腔科收治的后牙缺失并行种植修复的120例患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组,各60例。对照组采取常规种植修复方案,观察组采用数字化种植修复技术,比较两组咬合接触分布情况、咀嚼舒适度、美观满意度、并发症发生率。结果 观察组修复后咬合接触分布评分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组修复后咀嚼舒适度评分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组修复后牙冠形态、颜色匹配、边缘协调性、整体美观评分及总分均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率(10.00%)低于对照组(16.67%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 数字化种植修复技术能够改善后牙缺失患者的咬合接触分布,提高患者的咀嚼舒适度与美观满意度,且整体安全性良好。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effect of different implant restoration protocols on masticatory comfort and aesthetic satisfaction in patients with posterior tooth loss. Methods A total of 120 patients with posterior tooth loss undergoing implant restoration treated in the Department of Stomatology, the Fourth Hospital of Changsha from January 2023 to January 2025 were selected as the research subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the control group and the observation group, with 60 patients in each group. The control group received conventional implant restoration, and the observation group received digital implant restoration. The occlusal contact distribution, masticatory comfort, aesthetic satisfaction and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results After restoration, the occlusal contact distribution score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The masticatory comfort score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The scores of crown morphology, color matching, marginal coordination, overall aesthetics and total score in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group (10.00%) was lower than that in the control group (16.67%), but the difference was not statistically signiffcant (P>0.05). Conclusion Digital implant restoration can improve the occlusal contact distribution of patients with posterior tooth loss, and improve masticatory comfort and aesthetic satisfaction, with good overall safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

雷 邓,周英斌,唐圣斌,等.不同种植修复方案对后牙缺失患者咀嚼舒适度与美观满意度的影响[J].医学美学美容,2026,35(8):57-60.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码