瓷贴面对前牙美学修复患者牙周健康水平及美学效果的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六六医院口腔科 辽宁

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative Study on the Clinical Application Effects of Porcelain Veneers and All-Ceramic Crowns in Anterior Aesthetic Restorations
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 观察前牙美学修复中瓷贴面与全瓷冠临床应用效果。方法 以我院2025年1月至2026年1月收治的60例需要进行前牙美学修复的患者作为研究对象,以随机数字表法将其分为参照组(全瓷冠修复)和实验组(瓷贴面修复),每组30例。观察两组治疗前后牙周健康水平[包括附着丧失(AL)、牙周袋深度(PD)、菌斑指数(PLI)、牙龈出血指数(BI)]、美学效果[红色美学指数(PES)、白色美学指数(WES)]、治疗效果、并发症发生情况。结果 两组治疗后牙周健康水平均明显提高,实验组提高幅度大于参照组,其AL及PD检测结果、PLI及BI评分均明显低于参照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后牙龈、牙冠美学效果均明显提高,实验组提高幅度大于参照组,其牙龈美学效果PES评分和牙冠美学效果WES评分均明显高于参照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗效果均较好,实验组治疗总有效率稍高于参照组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组并发症总发生率明显低于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 前牙美学修复中,瓷贴面与全瓷冠的临床应用效果均较好,但是瓷贴面修复在提高牙周健康水平及美学效果方面更具优势,且并发症更少。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe the clinical application effects of porcelain veneers and all-ceramic crowns in anterior aesthetic restoration.ethods Sixty patients requiring anterior aesthetic restoration admitted to our hospital from January 2025 to January 2026 were selected as the research subjects and divided into a refere group (all-ceramic crown restoration) and an experimental group (porcelain veneer restoration) using the random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. T periodontal health levels [including attachment loss (AL), probing depth (PD), plaque index (PLI), and bleeding index (BI)], aesthetic effects [Pink Estheti Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES)], treatment effects, and complications were observed in both groups before and after treatment. Results After treatment, the periodontal health le both groups were significantly improved, with a greater improvement in the experimental group than in the reference group. The AL and PD results and PLI and BI scores in the experimental group were signifiy lower than those in the reference group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the aesthetic effects of the gingiva and crown in bothignificantly improved, with a greater improvement in the experimental group than in the reference group. The PES score for gingival aesthetic effect and the WES score for crown aesthetic eexperimental group were significantly higher than those in the reference group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The treatment effects of both groups were goth the total effective rate in the experimental group slightly higher than that in the reference group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The total incidence of clications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the reference group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion In anterior aesthetic restoration, both polain veneers and all-ceramic crowns have good clinical application effects; however, porcelain veneer restoration has advantages in improving periodontal health levels and aesthetic effects, and is assd with fewer complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-21
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-28
  • 录用日期:2026-04-29
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码