湿润烧伤膏促进肛瘘术后皮肤创面修复有效性与安全性的系统评价与Meta分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

南京中医药大学附属南京中医院肛肠一科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R65.5?

基金项目:

2023年江苏省中医肛肠疾病临床医学创新中心重点项目(苏中医科教函(2023)1号)GCCXZX-2021


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:目的:系统评价湿润烧伤膏(MEBO)促进肛瘘术后创面修复、皮肤再生的临床有效性及安全性,为MEBO促进肛瘘术后创面功能与外观一体化修复提供循证依据。方法:检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL、CNKI、万方数据、维普及SinoMed数据库,搜集MEBO用于肛瘘术后创面的随机对照试验(RCT),采用RoB2.0工具评估偏倚风险,RevMan5.4进行Meta分析;主要结局报告合并效应量及95%预测区间(PI),并采用HKSJ方法进行稳健性分析。本研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251182838)。结果:共纳入13篇RCT,涉及1145例患者。与常规护理/常规敷料相比,MEBO可缩短创面完全愈合时间(MD=-6.01 d,95%CI:-7.46~-4.55,P<0.01,95%PI:-11.69~-0.32),并提高术后14 d皮肤创面修复进程(MD=12.23个百分点,95%CI:0.50~23.95,P=0.04)。疼痛方面,术后1周窗口(D6–8)差异不显著;术后2周(D13–15)疼痛评分降低(MD=-0.48,95%CI:-0.93~-0.04,P=0.03)。此外,MEBO可改善术后约2周创面分泌物评分,减轻局部炎症反应,改善局部组织状态(SMD=-0.56,95%CI:-0.92~-0.20,P=0.003),提高临床有效率(RR=1.53,95%CI:1.13~2.08,P=0.006),并可能降低并发症发生风险(RR=0.18,95%CI:0.03~0.97,P=0.05)。Egger检验未提示主要结局存在显著发表偏倚(P=0.174)。结论:现有证据提示MEBO局部应用可能促进肛瘘术后皮肤创面修复与上皮再生,缩短愈合时间,同时在术后中早期对疼痛缓解、创面渗出控制、局部组织状态改善及修复质量具有一定积极作用。但由于研究方法学质量参差、异质性显著及安全性结局报告不足,证据确定性总体受限,当前证据尚不足以支持常规推荐。仍需高质量、多中心、结局标准化且充分报告不良事件的RCT进一步验证其在创面修复及美容愈合中的疗效与安全性。

    Abstract:

    Abstract Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) in promoting postoperative wound repair and cutaneous regeneration after anal fistula surgery, and to provide evidence for the integrated functional and appearance-related repair of postoperative wounds.Methods: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and SinoMed were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating MEBO for postoperative wounds after anal fistula surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. For the primary outcome, pooled effect estimates with 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were reported, and robustness was further examined using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) method. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251182838).Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 1145 patients were included. Compared with conventional care or standard dressings, MEBO significantly shortened the time to complete wound healing(MD=-6.01 d,95%CI:-7.46~-4.55,P<0.01,95%PI:-11.69~-0.32)and improved cutaneous wound repair progress at postoperative day 14(MD=12.23 percentage points,95%CI:0.50~23.95,P=0.04).For pain outcomes, the prespecified time window at 1 week(D6–8)showed no significant difference. Pain scores were reduced at 2 weeks(D13–15)(MD=-0.48,95%CI:-0.93~-0.04,P=0.03). In addition, MEBO improved wound exudate scores at approximately 2 weeks after surgery, alleviated local inflammatory responses, and improved local tissue conditions(SMD=-0.56,95%CI:-0.92~-0.20,P=0.003).MEBO also increased the overall clinical effectiveness rate(RR=1.53,95%CI:1.13~2.08,P=0.006),and may reduce the risk of complications(RR=0.18,95%CI:0.03~0.97,P=0.05).Egger’s test indicated no significant publication bias for the primary outcome(P=0.174). Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that topical MEBO may promote postoperative cutaneous wound repair and re-epithelialization after anal fistula surgery, shorten healing time, and exert beneficial effects on pain relief, exudate control, improvement of local tissue status, and wound repair quality during the early to intermediate postoperative period. However, because of variable methodological quality, substantial heterogeneity, and insufficient reporting of safety outcomes, the overall certainty of the evidence remains limited. The current evidence is therefore insufficient to support routine recommendation of MEBO. High-quality, multicenter RCTs with standardized outcome measures and comprehensive adverse-event reporting are still needed to further clarify its efficacy and safety in wound repair and aesthetic-related healing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-18
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-07
  • 录用日期:2026-04-08
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码