复合树脂高强纤维贴面与铸瓷贴面在前牙小范围牙体缺损修复中的应用效果比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

上海市静安区牙病防治所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较everStick树脂贴面与部分瓷贴面在前牙小范围牙体缺损修复中的临床疗效和美学效果。方法 选择2022年10月~2024年9月上海市静安区牙防所收治的71例前牙小范围牙体缺损患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为实验组(36例)和对照组(35例)。对照组使用部分铸瓷贴面修复方式,实验组使用everStick部分树脂贴面修复方式。比较两组即刻和修复后修复效果、白色美学效果。结果 两组即刻修复效果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。修复后6个月,修复效果、白色美学效果对比,实验组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 在前牙小范围牙体缺损修复中,everStick树脂贴面技术的修复效果与美学效果优于部分瓷贴面技术。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the clinical and aesthetic effects of everStick resin laminate veneer and partial porcelain laminate veneer in repairing small anterior tooth defects. Methods A total of 71 patients with small anterior tooth defects who were admitted to Jing'an Dental Clinic in Shanghai from October 2022 to September 2024 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into the experimental group (36 cases) and the control group (35 cases) using a table of random numbers. The control group underwent repair with partial porcelain laminate veneer while the experimental group underwent repair with everStick resin laminate veneer. The immediate repair effect, effect after repair, white aesthetic effect and satisfaction were compared between the groups. Results No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in immediate restoration outcomes (P>0.05). At 6 months post-restoration, the experimental group demonstrated superior restoration efficacy and white aesthetic outcomes compared to the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion For repairing small anterior tooth defects, everStick resin laminate veneer is superior to partial porcelain laminate veneer in terms of repair effect and aesthetic effect.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-03
  • 最后修改日期:2026-03-10
  • 录用日期:2026-03-12
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码